Comments on: Standards-compliant New Window Links http://www.komodomedia.com/blog/2007/01/prototype-standards-compliance-new-window-links/ blog, webdesign, illustration & newsk00l javascript Thu, 09 Feb 2012 09:09:16 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: Dan http://www.komodomedia.com/blog/2007/01/prototype-standards-compliance-new-window-links/comment-page-1/#comment-171639 Dan Mon, 07 Jul 2008 19:00:33 +0000 http://komodomedia.com/blog/index.php/2007/01/31/prototype-standards-compliance-new-window-links/#comment-171639 I generally use <code>onclick="window.open(this.href)"</code> right in the anchors, but it makes pretty good sense to bind something with rel="external" I generally use

onclick="window.open(this.href)"

right in the anchors, but it makes pretty good sense to bind something with rel=”external”

]]> By: Britney http://www.komodomedia.com/blog/2007/01/prototype-standards-compliance-new-window-links/comment-page-1/#comment-147362 Britney Sun, 16 Dec 2007 06:01:15 +0000 http://komodomedia.com/blog/index.php/2007/01/31/prototype-standards-compliance-new-window-links/#comment-147362 Nice site! Big thanx to webmaster!t Nice site! Big thanx to webmaster!t

]]> By: Madis http://www.komodomedia.com/blog/2007/01/prototype-standards-compliance-new-window-links/comment-page-1/#comment-105960 Madis Fri, 19 Oct 2007 20:22:11 +0000 http://komodomedia.com/blog/index.php/2007/01/31/prototype-standards-compliance-new-window-links/#comment-105960 You could also use xhtml +mathml doctype, it has valid target for link, no javascript. You could also use xhtml +mathml doctype, it has valid target for link, no javascript.

]]> By: GeG http://www.komodomedia.com/blog/2007/01/prototype-standards-compliance-new-window-links/comment-page-1/#comment-84824 GeG Sun, 09 Sep 2007 17:20:53 +0000 http://komodomedia.com/blog/index.php/2007/01/31/prototype-standards-compliance-new-window-links/#comment-84824 it seems that your site ate most parts of my xml :-( you can see at http://pastebin.com/f30b7548f what i mean it seems that your site ate most parts of my xml :-(

you can see at http://pastebin.com/f30b7548f what i mean

]]> By: GeG http://www.komodomedia.com/blog/2007/01/prototype-standards-compliance-new-window-links/comment-page-1/#comment-84822 GeG Sun, 09 Sep 2007 17:12:22 +0000 http://komodomedia.com/blog/index.php/2007/01/31/prototype-standards-compliance-new-window-links/#comment-84822 Hi Rogie, as far as i remember, there is a xhtml strict compliant way to use the target attribute, but it was some time ago i used it, so i hope i remember correctly. Use this as doctype (it is your own document type, based on xhtml strict): and at http://yoursite.example.com/DTD/xhtml-target.dtd put this (here you include the target attribute, you just add the modularized target part of the w3.org doc type to the basic xhtml strict w3.org doc type): %xhtml-da tatypes.mod;]]> %xhtml-qname. mod;]]> %xhtml11.dtd; %xhtml-targe t.mod;]]> afaik this is the w3.org compliant way (see http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml-modularization/Overview.html under 5.12) Cheers GeG Hi Rogie,

as far as i remember, there is a xhtml strict compliant way to use the target attribute, but it was some time ago i used it, so i hope i remember correctly. Use this as doctype (it is your own document type, based on xhtml strict):

and at http://yoursite.example.com/DTD/xhtml-target.dtd put this (here you include the target attribute, you just add the modularized target part of the w3.org doc type to the basic xhtml strict w3.org doc type):

%xhtml-da
tatypes.mod;]]>

%xhtml-qname.
mod;]]>

%xhtml11.dtd;

%xhtml-targe
t.mod;]]>

afaik this is the w3.org compliant way (see http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml-modularization/Overview.html under 5.12)

Cheers
GeG

]]> By: Hillary http://www.komodomedia.com/blog/2007/01/prototype-standards-compliance-new-window-links/comment-page-1/#comment-46348 Hillary Thu, 31 May 2007 20:02:34 +0000 http://komodomedia.com/blog/index.php/2007/01/31/prototype-standards-compliance-new-window-links/#comment-46348 I\'m love this great website. Many thanks guyt I\’m love this great website. Many thanks guyt

]]> By: Jonathan http://www.komodomedia.com/blog/2007/01/prototype-standards-compliance-new-window-links/comment-page-1/#comment-44093 Jonathan Thu, 24 May 2007 05:44:02 +0000 http://komodomedia.com/blog/index.php/2007/01/31/prototype-standards-compliance-new-window-links/#comment-44093 Thanks! Thanks!

]]> By: alhaurin http://www.komodomedia.com/blog/2007/01/prototype-standards-compliance-new-window-links/comment-page-1/#comment-27871 alhaurin Wed, 28 Feb 2007 20:13:43 +0000 http://komodomedia.com/blog/index.php/2007/01/31/prototype-standards-compliance-new-window-links/#comment-27871 Look at all the posibilities of this "factory" of widgets RSS "beon" presents you: http://factory.beon4u.com/factory.aspx It´s great, isn´t it? Look at all the posibilities of this “factory” of widgets RSS “beon” presents you:

http://factory.beon4u.com/factory.aspx

It´s great, isn´t it?

]]> By: Anders Tornblad http://www.komodomedia.com/blog/2007/01/prototype-standards-compliance-new-window-links/comment-page-1/#comment-23644 Anders Tornblad Thu, 01 Feb 2007 17:55:41 +0000 http://komodomedia.com/blog/index.php/2007/01/31/prototype-standards-compliance-new-window-links/#comment-23644 I'll try to answer that one question with just one sentence: JavaScript should be the technology of choice for the "behavior enhancement tier" of any web-based architecture - not the "behavior tier". I’ll try to answer that one question with just one sentence:

JavaScript should be the technology of choice for the “behavior enhancement tier” of any web-based architecture – not the “behavior tier”.

]]> By: Rogie http://www.komodomedia.com/blog/2007/01/prototype-standards-compliance-new-window-links/comment-page-1/#comment-23640 Rogie Thu, 01 Feb 2007 17:39:37 +0000 http://komodomedia.com/blog/index.php/2007/01/31/prototype-standards-compliance-new-window-links/#comment-23640 @Anders: As far as losing forms data, man you are right on. I feel like a flippin' idiot. Oh, well, a humble web developer is a good web developer. I have one question for you. Do you feel that JavaScript behaviors should be done away from entirely? @Anders: As far as losing forms data, man you are right on. I feel like a flippin’ idiot. Oh, well, a humble web developer is a good web developer.

I have one question for you. Do you feel that JavaScript behaviors should be done away from entirely?

]]>